Anda belum login :: 21 Jan 2022 14:45 WIB
Detail
ArtikelPerubahan UU Pasar Modal Ditinjau Dari Pandangan Praktisi Hukum  
Oleh: Pramono, Nindyo
Jenis: Article from Journal - ilmiah nasional - tidak terakreditasi DIKTI
Dalam koleksi: Jurnal Hukum Bisnis vol. 14 (Jul. 2001), page 30-36.
Ketersediaan
  • Perpustakaan Pusat (Semanggi)
    • Nomor Panggil: JJ102.8
    • Non-tandon: 1 (dapat dipinjam: 0)
    • Tandon: tidak ada
    Lihat Detail Induk
Isi artikelThe Revison Plan of Market Regulation (“RUUPM” has indicated a principle change that is Independence of the Controlling Institution of Capital Market (“ BAPEPAM”), Independence is described as freedom from the control ogf other parties including executive in implementing its function and its authority,. In the RUUPM, there are still some mixed up understanding of task, fubnction and its authority of the BAPEPAM. The extend to which the BAPEPAM has really occupied its independent, there is a need of the RUUPM elaboratorion.”Twee juristen drie menigen, “ Dutch’s aphorism stated. (Free translation: Two Jurist Two Different opinions). Other points to be paid attention are a share with nominal value. Both of shares have been known in the with nominal value and a share without nominal value. Both of shares have been known shares have been known in the world’s stock market, however, the share without nominal value I unknown either in the Public Limited Company regulation of Indonesia or that of Dutch. Moreover, Act NO.1/1995 stated that a Public Limited Company has been banned to issue share without nominal value have been traded publicly, since trading of shares are very profitable for the trader. Therefore, a concept of trading share without nominal value motivated the Auhority Institution in in order to regulate
Opini AndaKlik untuk menuliskan opini Anda tentang koleksi ini!

Kembali
design
 
Process time: 0.015625 second(s)