Measuring Relative Cue Weighting: A Reply to Morrison  

Oleh:

Boersma, Paul ; Escudero, Paola

Jenis: Article from Journal - ilmiah internasional
Dalam koleksi: Studies in Second Language Acquisition (sebagian Full Text & ada di PROQUEST Th.2001-) vol. 27 no. 4 (Dec. 2005), page 607-618.
Fulltext: out(10).pdf (165.75KB)

Ketersediaan

Perpustakaan PKBB Nomor Panggil: 405/SSL/27 Non-tandon: tidak ada Tandon: 1

Lihat Detail Induk

Isi artikel

Morrison (this issue) criticized the analytical and statistical methods that Escuero and Boersma (2004) used for assessing the participants' cue weighting in their listening experiments. He proposed that logistic regression constirtes a better method for measuring perceptual cue weighting than Escudero and Boersma's "edge difference ratio." The present paper starts by summarizing and illustrating Escudero and Boersma's experiment and analysis method and then addresses five of Morrison's objections-namely the alleged ceiling effect, the alleged superiority of logistic regression, the problem of discarding data, the (dis)confirmation of two-category assimilation, and Escudero and Boersma's grouping of the data. We will argue that although logistic regresion is a very good method for measuring cue weighting, there was nothing wrong with Escudero and Boersma's methodology in these five respects.

Opini Anda

Klik untuk menuliskan opini Anda tentang koleksi ini!

Kembali