A Meta - Analytic Investigation of The Susceptibility of Integrity Tests to Faking and Coaching  

Oleh:

Dwight, Stephen A. ; Alliger, George M.

Jenis: Article from Journal - ilmiah internasional
Dalam koleksi: Educational and Psychological Measurement vol. 60 no. 1 (2000), page 59-72.
Topik: INTEGRITY; tests; employees; behaviour; personality
Fulltext: 59.pdf (77.57KB)

Ketersediaan

Perpustakaan Pusat (Semanggi) Nomor Panggil: EE30.5 Non-tandon: 1 (dapat dipinjam: 0) Tandon: tidak ada

Lihat Detail Induk

Isi artikel

Although it has been consistently found that test takers can effectively fake good on self - report non cognitive measures when instructed to do so, not all measures are equally susceptible. The present review meta - analytically synthesized studies that have investigated the extent to which individuals can inflate their integrity test scores when coached or instructed to fake good. Both overt and personality - based integrity tests were investigated. Results indicated that the oert test was especially susceptible to both fake good (d = 0,90) and coaching (d = 1,32) instructions. Personality - based measures appeared to be more resistant to both faking good (d = 0,38) and coaching (d = 0,36). Implications of these results for integrity testing are discussed.

Opini Anda

Klik untuk menuliskan opini Anda tentang koleksi ini!

Kembali