When Integration Does Not Necessarily Imply Integration : Different Conceptualization of Acculturation Orientations Lead to Different Classification  

Oleh:

Vanbeselaere, Norbert ; Soenens, Bart ; Boen, Filip ; Snauwaert, Boris

Jenis: Article from Journal - ilmiah internasional
Dalam koleksi: Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology (http://journals.sagepub.com/home/jcca) vol. 34 no. 2 (Mar. 2003), page 231-239.
Topik: integration; acculturation orientations; methodology; conceptualization
Fulltext: 231.pdf (90.42KB)

Ketersediaan

Perpustakaan Pusat (Semanggi) Nomor Panggil: JJ86.9 Non-tandon: 1 (dapat dipinjam: 0) Tandon: tidak ada

Lihat Detail Induk

Isi artikel

This study compared three conceptualizations of acculturation orientations (i. e. contact, adoption, and identification) in two samples of ethnic minority members (N = 290) in belgium. In line with the hypotheses, these conceptualization yielded substantially different distributions of participants across four acculturation orientations (i. e. integration, assimilation, separation, and marginalization). Integration was the most popular orientation according to the contact conceptualization, but separation was the most popular one according to the adoption and identification conceptualization.

Opini Anda

Klik untuk menuliskan opini Anda tentang koleksi ini!

Kembali