Condition R  

Oleh:

Lidz, Jeffrey

Jenis: Article from Journal - ilmiah internasional
Dalam koleksi: Linguistic Inquiry (ada di JSTOR) vol. 32 no. 1 (2001), page 123-140.
Fulltext: Vol 32 No 1 pp 123-140.pdf (1.93MB)

Ketersediaan

Perpustakaan PKBB Nomor Panggil: 405/LII/32 Non-tandon: 1 (dapat dipinjam: 0) Tandon: tidak ada

Lihat Detail Induk

Isi artikel

Reinhart and Reuland (1993) partition the set of anaphors into two syntactic subclasses: SELF anaphors, which reflexivize predicates, and SE anaphors, which, like pronominals, do not. This palftition is intended to capture the antilocality of the SE anaphors. I argue that the appropriate partitioning of anaphors is semantic and n()t syntactic. Reinhart and Reuland's SELF anaphors are "near-refleJcives," interpreted as a representation of their antecedents, whereas their SE anaphors are "pure-reflexives," requiring identity with their antecedents. The anti locality effects with pure reflexives are due to (Condition R, a principle requiring reflexivity to be lexically expressed!. The Condition R approach correctly accounts for the meanings of the two kinds of anaphors, grouping the near reflexives with pronominailS and names, and correctly dissociates semantic reflexivity from the calculation of syntactic binding domains. Keywords: binding theory, reflexivity, near-reflexivirty, Kannada, Dutch

Opini Anda

Klik untuk menuliskan opini Anda tentang koleksi ini!

Kembali