Anda belum login :: 25 Apr 2025 07:04 WIB
Detail
ArtikelPrinciple D  
Oleh: Minkoff, Seth A.
Jenis: Article from Journal - ilmiah internasional
Dalam koleksi: Linguistic Inquiry (ada di JSTOR) vol. 31 no. 4 (2000), page 583-608.
Fulltext: Vol 31 No 4 pp 583-608.pdf (2.69MB)
Ketersediaan
  • Perpustakaan PKBB
    • Nomor Panggil: 405/LII/31
    • Non-tandon: 1 (dapat dipinjam: 0)
    • Tandon: tidak ada
    Lihat Detail Induk
Isi artikelCertain acceptability contrasts attending pronominal and SELF-anaphor binding are not accounted for by previous theories of Principles A and B. These contrasts are produced by "Principle D," which limits the binding domains of antecedents that are "nonselected," that is, of antecedents that form arguments of predicates that do not restrict the class of arguments with which these antecedents may acceptably be replaced. Further, assuming that Principle D violations are less unacceptable than Principle B violations and more unacceptable than Principle A violations, Principle D's interactions with Principles A and B account for gradations of unacceptability that cannot be accounted for using the "acceptable/unacceptable" dichotomy posited in most previous works. Keywords: binding, Principle D, Principle A, Principle B, coreference, proposition
Opini AndaKlik untuk menuliskan opini Anda tentang koleksi ini!

Kembali
design
 
Process time: 0.015625 second(s)