Differences and similarities between scalar inferences and scalar modifiers: The case of quantifiers  

Oleh:

McNabb, Yaron

Jenis: Article from Proceeding
Dalam koleksi: Proceedings of the 25th Semantics and Linguistic Theory Conference, held at Stanford University, May 15-17, 2015, page 267-287.
Topik: scalar implicature; quantifiers; superlative modifiers; scalar diversity; experimental pragmatics
Fulltext: 3124-4280-1-PB.pdf (615.47KB)

Isi artikel

Despite the rich theoretical and experimental work on scalar implicature, many of the studies on this topic were limited to some vs. all, neglecting the cross-categorial pervasiveness of the phenomena. The few experimental studies involving a more diverse group of scalar implicatures have found variation among expressions in the likelihood they give rise to scalar implicature, thereby challenging the assumption that scalar implicature (and generalized conversational implicature) is a uniform phenomenon (Doran, Baker, McNabb, Larson & Ward 2009; Doran, Ward, Larson, McNabb & Baker 2012; van Tiel, van Miltenburg, Zevakhina & Geurts 2014). This paper presents a first, systematic investigation of the degree to which a large group of quantifiers give rise to the implicature ‘not all’ using an utterance compatibility task with a modified Likert scale. Two accounts for the variation among quantifiers are proposed: (i) Shared semantic properties among three coherent groups of quantifiers account for the degree they give rise to upperbound implicature; or (ii) the likelihood of an implicature is a function of the scalar distance between the various quantifiers and ‘all.’ The predictions these two accounts make are discussed, charting the way to a future investigation of the heterogeneity of scalar implicature.

Opini Anda

Klik untuk menuliskan opini Anda tentang koleksi ini!

Kembali