Time to Move On? When Entity Theorists Perform Better Than Incremental Theorists  

Oleh:

Park, Daeun ; Kim, Sara

Jenis: Article from Journal - ilmiah internasional
Dalam koleksi: Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (http://journals.sagepub.com/home/pspc) vol. 41 no. 5 (May 2015), page 736-748.
Topik: theory of intelligence; performance; rumination; working memory
Fulltext: PSPB_41_05_736.pdf (990.07KB)

Ketersediaan

Perpustakaan Pusat (Semanggi) Nomor Panggil: PP45 Non-tandon: 1 (dapat dipinjam: 0) Tandon: tidak ada

Lihat Detail Induk

Isi artikel

Previous research has shown that when confronted with failure, individuals with a fixed view of intelligence (entity theorists) perform worse on subsequent tasks than those with a malleable view of intelligence (incremental theorists). This study finds that entity theorists perform worse than incremental theorists only when they believe that a subsequent task measures the same ability as the task they previously failed. However, when individuals believe that the subsequent task measures an ability unrelated to the ability needed for the initial failed task, incremental theorists perform worse than entity theorists. Across five studies, we show that entity theorists are more likely to choose a different-ability task as a second task and perform better than incremental theorists on that task. We also examine the role of thoughts about previous failure in the performance differences.

Opini Anda

Klik untuk menuliskan opini Anda tentang koleksi ini!

Kembali