Brutality Under Cover of Ambiguity: Activating, Perpetuating, and Deactivating Covert Retributivism  

Oleh:

Fincher, Katrina M. ; Tetlock, Philip E.

Jenis: Article from Journal - ilmiah internasional
Dalam koleksi: Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (http://journals.sagepub.com/home/pspc) vol. 41 no. 5 (May 2015), page 629-642.
Topik: ambiguity; self-deception; impression management; retribution; punishment
Fulltext: PSPB_41_05_629.pdf (1.0MB)

Ketersediaan

Perpustakaan Pusat (Semanggi) Nomor Panggil: PP45 Non-tandon: 1 (dapat dipinjam: 0) Tandon: tidak ada

Lihat Detail Induk

Isi artikel

Five studies tested four hypotheses on the drivers of punitive judgments. Study 1 showed that people imposed covertly retributivist physical punishments on extreme norm violators when they could plausibly deny that is what they were doing (attributional ambiguity). Studies 2 and 3 showed that covert retributivism could be suppressed by subtle accountability manipulations that cue people to the possibility that they might be under scrutiny. Studies 4 and 5 showed how covert retributivism can become self-sustaining by biasing the lessons people learn from experience. Covert retributivists did not scale back punitiveness in response to feedback that the justice system makes false-conviction errors but they did ramp up punitiveness in response to feedback that the system makes false-acquittal errors. Taken together, the results underscore the paradoxical nature of covert retributivism: It is easily activated by plausible deniability and persistent in the face of false-conviction feedback but also easily deactivated by minimalist forms of accountability.

Opini Anda

Klik untuk menuliskan opini Anda tentang koleksi ini!

Kembali