Two Faces of Group-Based Shame: Moral Shame and Image Shame Differentially Predict Positive and Negative Orientations to Ingroup Wrongdoing  

Oleh:

Allpress, Jesse A. ; Brown, Rupert ; Giner-Sorolla, Roger ; Deonna, Julien A. ; Teroni, Fabrice

Jenis: Article from Journal - ilmiah internasional
Dalam koleksi: Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (http://journals.sagepub.com/home/pspc) vol. 40 no. 10 (Oct. 2014), page 1270–1284.
Topik: shame; guilt; apology; avoidance
Fulltext: Pers Soc Psychol Bull-2014-Allpress-1270-84_ros.pdf (580.89KB)

Ketersediaan

Perpustakaan Pusat (Semanggi) Nomor Panggil: PP45 Non-tandon: 1 (dapat dipinjam: 0) Tandon: tidak ada

Lihat Detail Induk

Isi artikel

This article proposes distinctions between guilt and two forms of shame: Guilt arises from a violated norm and is characterized by a focus on specific behavior; shame can be characterized by a threatened social image (Image Shame) or a threatened moral essence (Moral Shame). Applying this analysis to group-based emotions, three correlational studies are reported, set in the context of atrocities committed by (British) ingroup members during the Iraq war (Ns = 147, 256, 399). Results showed that the two forms of shame could be distinguished. Moreover, once the other form of shame was controlled for, they were differentially related to orientations toward the outgroup: Image Shame was associated with negative orientations, whereas Moral Shame had associations with positive outgroup orientations. These associations were distinct from the associations of guilt and rejection. Study 3 used a longitudinal design and provided evidence suggestive of a causal direction from emotions to outgroup orientation.

Opini Anda

Klik untuk menuliskan opini Anda tentang koleksi ini!

Kembali