Elective single-embryo transfer in women aged 40–44 years  

Oleh:

Niinimaki, M. ; Suikkari, A.-M. ; Mäkinen, S. ; Soderstrom-Anttila, V.

Jenis: Article from Journal - ilmiah internasional
Dalam koleksi: Human Reproduction vol. 28 no. 02 (Feb. 2013), page 331-335.
Topik: INFERTILITY; In vitro fertilization; single-embryo transfer; cumulative pregnancy rate

Ketersediaan

Perpustakaan FK Nomor Panggil: H07.K.2013.01 Non-tandon: 1 (dapat dipinjam: 0) Tandon: tidak ada

Lihat Detail Induk

Isi artikel

STUDY QUESTION Is an elective single-embryo transfer (eSET) policy feasible for women aged 40 or older? SUMMARY ANSWER For older women (aged 40–44 years) with a good prognosis, an eSET policy can be applied with acceptable cumulative clinical pregnancy rates and live birth rates. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Various studies have shown the effectiveness of eSET in women aged <35 years with high cumulative pregnancy rates and low rates of multiple births. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION This retrospective cohort study included 628 women treated between 2000 and 2009. PARTICIPANTS, SETTING, METHODS Women aged 40–44 years underwent a fresh cycle of IVF or ICSI treatment with eSET (n = 264) or double-embryo transfer (DET) (n = 364). In the subsequent frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles, SET/DET was performed in both groups according to the number of embryos available and the opinion of the couple. The study was performed at the Family Federation of Finland Helsinki Fertility Clinic. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE In the fresh cycles, the clinical pregnancy rates were 23.5 and 19.5% in the eSET and DET groups, respectively, and live birth rates were 13.6 and 11.0%, respectively. In the fresh cycles with eSET, there were no twin pregnancies, but in the DET group, there were three sets of twins (7.5%). The cumulative clinical pregnancy rates per oocyte retrieval were 37.1 and 24.2% in the eSET and DET groups, respectively (P < 0.001), and the cumulative live birth rates were 22.7 and 13.2%, respectively (P = 0.002). Cumulative twin rates were 6.7% (n = 4) in the eSET group and 8.3% (n = 4) in the DET group (P = 0.726). All of the twin pregnancies in the eSET group resulted from frozen and thawed DET embryo transfer cycles. LIMITATIONS The characteristics of the two patients groups are not comparable because the suitability of eSET was individually assessed by a clinician based on both clinical prognostic factors and the outcome of IVF or ICSI, i.e. the number and quality of embryos. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS This study may be generalized to IVF units having experience in eSET and cryopreservation. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) This study received no funding and there are no conflicts of interests to be declared.

Opini Anda

Klik untuk menuliskan opini Anda tentang koleksi ini!

Kembali