Etika Diskursus: Kritik Hubermas Terhadap Tradisi Hukum Dogmatik  

Oleh:

Seran, Alexander

Jenis: Article from Journal - ilmiah nasional - tidak terakreditasi DIKTI - atma jaya
Dalam koleksi: Atma nan Jaya vol. 11 no. 1 (Jun. 1998), page 127-136.
Topik: etika; Etika Diskursus
Fulltext: Alexsander Seran.pdf (543.03KB)

Ketersediaan

Perpustakaan Pusat (Semanggi) Nomor Panggil: AA48.8 Non-tandon: 1 (dapat dipinjam: 0) Tandon: tidak ada	Lihat Detail Induk
Perpustakaan PKBB Nomor Panggil: 405/ANJ/1 Non-tandon: tidak ada Tandon: 1	Lihat Detail Induk
Perpustakaan PKPM Nomor Panggil: A66 Non-tandon: 1 (dapat dipinjam: 0) Tandon: tidak ada	Lihat Detail Induk

Isi artikel

The important question of the legitimcay of law is What makes legal authority legitimate? Habermas's discourse on ethics advocates a sophisticated version of consent theory in which the legal political order retains roots in the process of communicative sociation, the discource theory of law rejects the legal positivist position that law is legitimate if it has been enacted in accordance with established legal procedures, At the same time, however appeal to natural law theory is precluded on the basis of radical democracy. The idea of radical democracy as Habermas puts it "Nothing ios given prior to the citizen's practice of self-determination other than the discourse principle, which is built in the conditions of communicative sociation in general, and the legal medium as such. Thus modernity must generate its own normativity from within itself, In modern societies the law can fulfill the function of stabilizing expectations only if it preserves an internal connection with a socially integrative force of communicative action.

Opini Anda

Klik untuk menuliskan opini Anda tentang koleksi ini!

Kembali