Detail Indonesia’s palm oil plantation regulations for promoting community protection and justice Bibliografi Author: Christiani, Theresia Anita ; Sundari, Elisabeth ; Wisnubroto, Aloysius ; Widiartana, Gregorius ; Cruz, Maristel M. Dela Topik: Agrarian Justice; Community Protection; Palm Oil Governance; Social Legitimacy Bahasa: (EN )    ISBN: E-ISSN: 31090931     Penerbit: Contrarius Institute     Tahun Terbit: 2026     Jenis: Article - diterbitkan di jurnal ilmiah internasional Fulltext: Indonesia’s palm oil plantation regulations.pdf (557.43KB; 0 download) Abstract The expansion of palm oil plantations in Indonesia has generated complex legal issues related to community protection in areas under Cultivation Rights, land tenure conflicts, and the effectiveness of justice mechanisms in natural resource governance. Although agrarian, plantation, environmental, and human rights regulations formally recognize community protection, empirical evidence demonstrates recurring agrarian conflicts and unequal distribution of benefits. This study aims to: (1) analyze legal instruments governing community protection in palm oil plantation management; (2) evaluate the effectiveness of justice mechanisms and the role of state institutions in regulatory enforcement; and (3) formulate a justice-based regulatory reconstruction through an international comparative approach. This research employs an empirical juridical method with a socio-legal approach, combining statutory analysis and fieldwork conducted in the operational areas of PT Agri Andalas, PT Bio Nusantara Teknologi, and PT Pamor Ganda in Bengkulu Province. The analysis draws on Rawls’ theory of distributive justice, the concept of the social function of land rights, and law as a tool of social engineering. The findings reveal that Indonesia faces a significant gap between regulation and implementation, characterized by the dominance of administrative legality, institutional fragmentation, and limited procedural participation. Although justice mechanisms formally exist, unequal access constrains the availability of substantive remedies. Comparative insights from the Netherlands, Canada, and Norway highlight the importance of integrated governance, binding community consent, transparency, and restorative grievance mechanisms. Strengthening community protection, therefore, requires a shift from administrative legality toward social legitimacy and distributive justice through institutional integration and stronger regulatory enforcement. Kajian editorial Article from : Contrarius Series: Law and Social Justice, Vol. 2, No. 3, October 2026 Opini Anda Klik untuk menuliskan opini Anda tentang koleksi ini! Lihat Sejarah Pengadaan  Konversi Metadata   Kembali

Copyright © 2006, 2007 Unika Atma Jaya, all rights reserved