Detail Regulation lawyers’ ethics in digital litigation : issues and reforms on access to electronic evidence Bibliografi Author: Suharto, Valentino Dodo ; Eljosa, Cisa ; Christiani, Theresia Anita Topik: Digitalization; E-Court; Electronic Evidence; Lawyers; Professional Ethics Bahasa: (EN )    ISBN: E-ISSN: 31090931     Penerbit: Contrarius Institute     Tahun Terbit: 2026     Jenis: Article - diterbitkan dalam Proceeding Internasional Fulltext: Regulation lawyers’ ethics in digital litigation.pdf (428.78KB; 0 download) Abstract The digitalization of Indonesia’s judiciary has generated new ethical challenges for the legal profession, particularly in relation to the access to and use of electronic evidence. Key concerns include potential breaches of data confidentiality, manipulation of digital evidence, and the absence of clear ethical standards governing advocates in e-court proceedings. Current procedural law and the advocates’ code of ethics do not adequately address the complexities associated with electronic evidence, thereby raising issues of privacy, cybersecurity, and procedural justice. This study aims to examine the ethical dilemmas faced by lawyers in digital litigation in Indonesia and to formulate both normative and institutional solutions to strengthen professional accountability. It employs normative legal research through statutory, conceptual, and philosophical approaches, supported by case analysis involving electronic evidence. The findings reveal a regulatory gap within the advocates’ code of ethics, as well as deficiencies in ethical oversight mechanisms. In practice, particularly within electronic court systems, the accessibility of electronic evidence by various parties increases the risk of misuse and highlights the urgent need for regulatory safeguards. Accordingly, this study suggests the necessity of reform through the incorporation of specific standards on electronic evidence into the advocates’ code of ethics, the enhancement of lawyers’ digital literacy, and the establishment of technical guidelines by professional organizations and the Supreme Court. Kajian editorial Article from : Contrarius Series: Law and Social Justice 2026; Vol (1): No [2] Opini Anda Klik untuk menuliskan opini Anda tentang koleksi ini! Lihat Sejarah Pengadaan  Konversi Metadata   Kembali

Copyright © 2006, 2007 Unika Atma Jaya, all rights reserved