The Instability of Freedom as Noninterference: The Case of Isaiah Berlin  

Oleh:

Pettit, Philip

Jenis: Article from Journal - ilmiah internasional
Dalam koleksi: Ethics: An International Journal of Social Political and Legal Philosophy vol. 121 no. 4 (Jul. 2011), page 693-716.
Topik: Freedom; Nonfrustration; Freedom Access

Ketersediaan

Perpustakaan Pusat (Semanggi) Nomor Panggil: EE44.33 Non-tandon: 1 (dapat dipinjam: 0) Tandon: tidak ada

Lihat Detail Induk

Isi artikel

In Hobbes, freedom of choice requires nonfrustration: the option you prefer must be accessible. In Berlin, it requires noninterference: every option, preferred or unpreferred, must be accessible-every door must be open. But Berlin's argument against Hobbes suggests a parallel argument that freedom requires something stronger still: that each option be accessible and that no one have the power to block access; the doors should be open, and there should be no powerful doorkeepers. This is freedom as nondomination. The claim is that freedom as noninterference is an unstable alternative between freedom as nonfrustration and freedom as nondomination.

Opini Anda

Klik untuk menuliskan opini Anda tentang koleksi ini!

Kembali