What's A Business For ?  

Oleh:

Handy, Charles

Jenis: Article from Bulletin/Magazine - ilmiah internasional
Dalam koleksi: Harvard Business Review bisa di lihat di link (http://web.b.ebscohost.com/ehost/command/detail?sid=f227f0b4-7315-44a4-a7f7-a7cd8cbad80b%40sessionmgr114&vid=12&hid=105&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#db=bth&jid=HBR) vol. 80 no. 12 (2002), page 49-55.
Topik: BUSINESS; business & society; business history; business philosophy; corporate responsibility; ethics; public opinion; social enterprise; social issues

Ketersediaan

Perpustakaan Pusat (Semanggi) Nomor Panggil: HH10.19 Non-tandon: 1 (dapat dipinjam: 0) Tandon: tidak ada

Lihat Detail Induk

Isi artikel

In the wake of the recent corporate scandals, it's time to reconsider the assumptions underlying American - style stock-market capitalism. That heady doctrine - in which the market is king, success is measured in terms of shareholder value, and profits are an end in themselves - enraptured America for a generation, spread to Britain during the 1980s, and recently began to gain acceptance in Continental Europe. But now, many wonder whether the American model is corrupt. The American scandals are not just a matter of dubious personal ethics or of rogue companies fudging the odd billion. And the cure for the problems will not come solely from tougher regulations. We must also ask more fundamental questions : Whom and what is a business for ? And are traditional ownership and governance structures suited to the knowledge economy ? According to corporate law, a company's financiers are its owners, and employees are treated as property and recorded as costs. But whereas that might have been true in the early days of industry, it does not reflect today's reality. Now a company's assets are increasingly found in the employees who contribute their time and talents rather than in the stockholders who temporarily contribute their money. The language and measures of business must be reversed. In a knowledge economy, a good business is a community with a purpose, not a piece of property.

Opini Anda

Klik untuk menuliskan opini Anda tentang koleksi ini!

Kembali