The Two Dogmas of Empirical Education in Medicine. A Commentary on Sales and Schlaff  

Oleh:

Schwab, Abraham

Jenis: Article from Journal - ilmiah internasional
Dalam koleksi: Social Science & Medicine (www.elsevier.com/locate/sosscimed) vol. 70 no. 11 (Jun. 2010), page 1677-1679.
Topik: Medical Education; Health Care Reform; Quality of Health Care; Physicians; USA; Review; Training

Ketersediaan

Perpustakaan Pusat (Semanggi) Nomor Panggil: SS53 Non-tandon: 1 (dapat dipinjam: 0) Tandon: tidak ada

Lihat Detail Induk

Isi artikel

Mounting evidence indicates that the practice patterns of physicians may be improved by an increased attention to social science. As such, the general features of the arguments in Sales and Schlaff's article "Reforming Medical Education: A review and synthesis of five critiques of medical practice" (2010) in this issue of Social Science & Medicine are easy to endorse. It seems, however, that the applications of social science are needed more urgently in the structure of medical practice that they are in the activities of particular physicians. In what follows, I expand on this point through a discussion of two dogmas of empirical training in medicine: the dominance of physical sciences and the legitimacy of intuitive judgement.

Opini Anda

Klik untuk menuliskan opini Anda tentang koleksi ini!

Kembali