The Bioethical Misconception: A Response to Lidz  

Oleh:

Timmermans, Stefan ; McKay, Tara

Jenis: Article from Journal - ilmiah internasional
Dalam koleksi: Social Science & Medicine (www.elsevier.com/locate/sosscimed) vol. 69 no. 12 (Dec. 2009), page 1793-1796.
Topik: USA; Clinical Trials; Pharmaceutical Industry; Human Subjects; Research Ethics; Substance Dependency; Bioethics; Therapeutic Misconception

Ketersediaan

Perpustakaan Pusat (Semanggi) Nomor Panggil: SS53 Non-tandon: 1 (dapat dipinjam: 0) Tandon: tidak ada

Lihat Detail Induk

Isi artikel

What matters most for a person struggling to quit methamphetamine? Is it the dearth of professional treatment options due to the stigmatization of addiction and decades of private and governmental neglect, or is it the issue of informed consent a randomized clinical trial? The difference between a bioethical and a sociological perspectives is summed up by Lidz's universalistic clam,"we value autonomous mutual participation for its own sake" (Lidz, 2009) in his commentary "Therapeutic Misconception and the Limits of Ethnography" in this issue of Social Science & Medicine.

Opini Anda

Klik untuk menuliskan opini Anda tentang koleksi ini!

Kembali