On the Necessity of Distinguishing between (Un)Boundedness and (A)Telicity  

Oleh:

Depraetere, Ilse

Jenis: Article from Journal - ilmiah internasional
Dalam koleksi: Linguistics and Philosophy=> ada di SpringerLink 1997(vol.1) - Mutakhir; JSTOR vol. 18 no. 1 (Feb. 1995), page 1-19.
Fulltext: 25001576.pdf (2.07MB)

Isi artikel

It is argued that two different types of concept are often intermingled in discussions of Aktionsart. The most common type of classification is one of situation types, relating to the potential actualisation of a situation, although some of the definitions have to do with the actual realization of the situation. This distinction, adequately captured by the notions (a)telicty and (un)boundedness (Declerck 1989), is explored and it is shown how NPs, PPs and tense influence a sentence's classification as (un)bounded.

Opini Anda

Klik untuk menuliskan opini Anda tentang koleksi ini!

Kembali