A Mixed-Motive Perspective on the Economics Versus Environment Debate  

Oleh:

Hoffman, Andrew J. ; Gillespie, James J. ; Moore, Don A. ; Wade-Benzoni, Kimberly A. ; Thompson, Leigh ; Bazerman, Max H.

Jenis: Article from Journal - e-Journal
Dalam koleksi: American Behavioral Scientist vol. 42 no. 08 (May 1999), page 1254-1276.
Topik: Debate; Win-Win Model; Economics Versus Environment Debate
Fulltext: 02. A Mixed-Motive Perspective on the Economics Versus Environment Debate__.pdf (2.42MB)

Isi artikel

The debate over the relationship between economic development and environmental protection has polarized into the opposing perspectives of win-lose (distributive bargaining) or win-win (integrative bargaining) outcomes, reminiscent of the debate that occurred within the negotiations field 15 years ago. The authors argue that such polarization is unnecessary and inaccurate. Conflict between economics and the environment is neither purely win-win nor win-lose, but rather, it is a mixed-motive situation. In presenting this argument, the authors draw from the negotiations and managerial decision-making literature. Furthermore, they consider some strategies for exposing mixed-motive solutions to environmental problems in the future.

Opini Anda

Klik untuk menuliskan opini Anda tentang koleksi ini!

Kembali