Anda belum login :: 29 Apr 2025 02:27 WIB
Detail
BukuPerbandingan Efektivitas Kerja Live, Attenuated, Influenza Vaccine (LAIV) dan Inactivated Influenza Vaccine (IIV) dalam Perlindungan terhadap Influenza pada Orang Dewasa
Bibliografi
Author: ANGKASA, JUDY RANITA ; Angelina, Yohanna (Advisor); Tanzil, Kunadi (Examiner)
Topik: INFLUENZA VACCINE; LAIV; IIV; vaccine effectiveness; influenza vaccine; influenza; efektivitas kerja; vaksin influenza; influenza
Bahasa: (ID )    
Penerbit: Fakultas Kedokteran Unika Atma Jaya     Tempat Terbit: Jakarta Utara    Tahun Terbit: 2015    
Jenis: Theses - Karya Tulis Ilmiah Kedokteran (KTI-FK)
Fulltext: KTI Judy.pdf (953.71KB; 14 download)
Ketersediaan
  • Perpustakaan FK
    • Nomor Panggil: KTI-FK-815
    • Non-tandon: tidak ada
    • Tandon: 1
 Lihat Detail Induk
Abstract
Background. Influenza is an acute disease that attacks the respiratory system.
Because it is highly contagious and can easily mutate, influenza virus frequently
causes pandemic and endemic worldwide. One of the many ways to prevent these
pandemic and endemic is by vaccination. There are two methods of vaccination
available (LAIV and IIV), and both differ in the mode of administration as well as
how they work in the human body.
Objectives. The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of LAIV and IIV in
terms of protection against influenza in the adult population.
Methodology. This systematic review references several medical textbooks, medical
research papers, as well as official scientific websites which are related to the topic.
The research papers used in this paper consist of papers that have been published
since five years ago, commencing from the year 2009.
Results and Conclusion. Each type of vaccination has advantages and
disadvantages. LAIV, because the administration pathway resembles influenza
infection in general, can induce a local immune response in the nasopharyngeal
mucosa and thus can better protect the upper respiratory tract from infection. In
terms of crossprotection, LAIV is more superior than IIV. The dominant immune
responses in LAIV consist of an increase in cytotoxic T cells (CD8) as well as an
increase in mucosal IgA. IIV, because it is administered parenterally, can induce a
systemic immune response and thus can better protect the lower respiratory tract
from infection. Increased serum antibodies induced by IIV is significant, with serum
IgG as the dominant antibody.
Suggestions. The suggestions to further improve this research consist of conducting
a comparative literature that discusses the effectiveness of LAIV and IIV in children,
as well as conducting more clinical trials comparing the effectiveness of these two
types of vaccine in the future. Also, the writer suggests on conducting comparative
literature studies which focuses on IIV which were given intranasally with LAIV.
Opini AndaKlik untuk menuliskan opini Anda tentang koleksi ini!

Lihat Sejarah Pengadaan  Konversi Metadata   Kembali
design
 
Process time: 0.078125 second(s)