Anda belum login :: 18 Apr 2025 09:38 WIB
Home
|
Logon
Hidden
»
Administration
»
Collection Detail
Detail
Molecular cytogenetic analysis by genomic hybridization to determine the cause of recurrent miscarriage
Oleh:
Perrin, Aurore
;
Delobel, Bruno
;
Andrieux, Joris
Jenis:
Article from Journal - ilmiah internasional
Dalam koleksi:
Fertility and Sterility (keterangan: ada di ClinicalKey) vol. 93 no. 06 (Apr. 2010)
,
page 2075.
Topik:
Microdeletion
;
array-CGH
;
meiotic segregation
;
recurrent miscarriage
;
translocation
Ketersediaan
Perpustakaan FK
Nomor Panggil:
F02.K.2010.02
Non-tandon:
1 (dapat dipinjam: 0)
Tandon:
tidak ada
Lihat Detail Induk
Isi artikel
Objective To characterize a t(2;6) by array-based comparative genomic hybridization (array-CGH) in a couple with recurrent miscarriage, to analyze the meiotic segregation of the t(2;6), and to discuss couple specific care-taking modality before intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Design Case report. Setting INSERM U613 in Brest, France. Patient(s) Couple consulting for infertility. Intervention(s) Array-CGH to characterize a t(2;6) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) to analyze the meiotic segregation were performed. Main Outcome Measure(s) Array-CGH, FISH with a panel of bacterial artificial chromosome clones and commercial probes. Result(s) Analyses from peripheral blood lymphocytes identified a t(2;6)(q35;q24) unbalanced reciprocal translocation with microdeletions on the der(2) and the der(6). FISH on spermatozoa found that the frequency of normal (23,X or 23,Y) or “translocation-deletions” (23,X,der(2),der(6) or 23,Y,der(2),der(6)) spermatozoa was 41.10%. Conclusion(s) For our 46,XY,t(2;6)(q35;q24) carrier, more than 50% of the spermatozoa are chromosomally unbalanced. Moreover, FISH does not permit a distinction between normal and “translocation-deletion” phenotypes. So, in the possibility of preimplantation genetic diagnosis, is it necessary to select the normal embryos to the detriment of those translocation-deletions carriers? The pathogenicity of these microdeletions not been proved. Because the family history was oriented toward a variation of genetic equipment without phenotypic consequences, the couple decided not to make a selection between the normal embryos and the translocation-deletion carrier embryos.
Opini Anda
Klik untuk menuliskan opini Anda tentang koleksi ini!
Kembali
Process time: 0.015625 second(s)