The Old English relative þe  

Oleh:

Seppanen, Aimo

Jenis: Article from Journal - ilmiah internasional
Dalam koleksi: English Language and Linguistics (Full Text & ada di PROQUEST th. 2005 - terbaru) vol. 8 no. 1 (Apr. 2004), page 71-102.
Fulltext: vol8.1;71-102.pdf (209.02KB)

Ketersediaan

Perpustakaan PKBB Nomor Panggil: SS23 Non-tandon: 1 (dapat dipinjam: 0) Tandon: tidak ada

Lihat Detail Induk

Isi artikel

In current accounts the Old English relative
e is analysed in two radically different ways. The traditional view, inherited from the nineteenth-century grammarians, views the word as a relative pronoun, while the generative analysis, derived from some remarks of Jespersen on the ModE relative that, takes it to be a subordinating particle. The generativist view is based on the word’s lack of morphological variation, whereas the older approach examines more generally the grammar of the word, noting that the invariable
e shares the typical nominal categories of number and case, functioning both as a singular and a plural and representing all the four cases of OE nominal elements. A further indication of the word’s nominal status is its referential function, distinguishing between specific and generic reference. Against these clear facts, the lack of overt inflection is a minor idiosyncrasy, paralleled by the OE generic man/mon, whose pronominal status is widely agreed. e may have been a subordinating particle in origin, but by historical OE times it retained this function in relative clauses only after relative adverbs, having been reanalysed elsewhere either as a relative adverb itself, or, in its most frequent relative use, as a pronoun.c

Opini Anda

Klik untuk menuliskan opini Anda tentang koleksi ini!

Kembali