Ethical Tension Points in Whistleblowing  

Oleh:

Jensen, J. Vernon

Jenis: Article from Journal - ilmiah internasional
Dalam koleksi: Journal of Business Ethics vol. 6 no. 4 (May 1987), page 321-328.
Topik: Ethical Tension Points; Whistleblowing

Ketersediaan

Perpustakaan Pusat (Semanggi) Nomor Panggil: BB27.6 Non-tandon: 1 (dapat dipinjam: 0) Tandon: tidak ada

Lihat Detail Induk

Isi artikel

This paper analyzes the number of procedural and substantive tension points with which a conscientious whistleblowing struggles. Included in the former are such questions as: (1) Am I properly depicting the seeriousness of the problem? (2) Have I secured the information properly, analyzed it appropriately, and presented it fairly? (3) Are my motives appropriate? (4) Have I tried fully enough to have the problem corrected within organization? (5) Should I blow the whistle while still a member of the organization or after having left it? (6) Should I keep anonymity? (7) How ethical is it to assume the role of a judge? (8) How ethical is it to set in motion an act which will likely be very costly to many people? Substantive tension points include such question as: (1) How fully am I living up to my moral obligations to my organization and my colleagues? (2) Am I appropriately upholding the ethical standards of my profession? (3) How adversely will my action affect my family and other primary groups? (4) Am I being true to myself? (5) How will my action affect the health of such basic values as freedom of expression, independence judgement, courage, fairness, cooperativeness, and loyalty?

Opini Anda

Klik untuk menuliskan opini Anda tentang koleksi ini!

Kembali