Anda belum login :: 16 Jun 2025 11:49 WIB
Detail
ArtikelThey read an article?  
Oleh: Roediger, Henry L.
Jenis: Article from Journal - ilmiah internasional
Dalam koleksi: American Psychologist vol. 46 no. 01 (Jan. 1991), page 37-40.
Ketersediaan
  • Perpustakaan PKPM
    • Nomor Panggil: A88
    • Non-tandon: 1 (dapat dipinjam: 0)
    • Tandon: tidak ada
    Lihat Detail Induk
Isi artikelIn a provocative essay, Neisser (1978) argued that memory research conducted under controlled laboratory conditions has produced no important knowledge and that investigators should turn to uncontrolled, naturalistic observation outside the lab. Banaji and Crowder (1989) argued for the importance of experimental control in producing generalizable knowledge. The authors of the current target articles attack Banaji and Crowder, but they never confront the main issue: whether experimental control is necessary or desirable in research. The commentators show that controlled research can be done Outside the lab, but such examples reinforce Banaji and Crowder's main point ahem the necessity of experimental control. Naturalistic observation is a good starting point for research, but a poor substitution for controlled experimentation 10 uncover that' important factors at work
Opini AndaKlik untuk menuliskan opini Anda tentang koleksi ini!

Kembali
design
 
Process time: 0 second(s)