Anda belum login :: 05 Jun 2025 03:01 WIB
Detail
ArtikelGovernment debt: The big sweat  
Oleh: The Economist
Jenis: Article from Bulletin/Magazine
Dalam koleksi: The Economist (http://search.proquest.com/) vol. 391 no. 8635 (Jun. 2009), page 70.
Topik: Banking Industry; Recession; Public Debts
Ketersediaan
  • Perpustakaan Pusat (Semanggi)
    • Nomor Panggil: EE29.55
    • Non-tandon: 1 (dapat dipinjam: 0)
    • Tandon: tidak ada
    Lihat Detail Induk
Isi artikelOVERINDULGENCE has a price. After years of scoffing food and swilling booze, the cost is physical. After a debt-fuelled financial bender, it is fiscal. Governments have been propping up the world economy with a borrowing spree of their own. The recession has drained tax revenues and policymakers have been spending unprecedented sums to get their economies going and support their banks. Sovereign debt is piling up. According to a study by economists at the IMF, published on June 9th, by next year the gross public debt of the ten richest countries attending the summits of the G20 club of big economies will reach 106% of GDP, up from 78% in 2007. That translates into more than $9 trillion of extra debt in three years. There is more to come. Because economic growth is likely to be weak for several years after the recession ends, especially in countries such as America and Britain where over-indebted consumers must rebuild their savings, budget deficits will remain big. The IMF economists’ baseline is that the government debt of the rich ten will hit 114% of GDP by 2014. Under a darker scenario in which economies languish for longer while fears about governments’ solvency push interest rates up, the debt ratio could be 150% (see chart 1). Governments have never borrowed so much in peacetime. Their huge debts will shape the world economy for a decade. In the short term the extra borrowing is prudent: governments must expand their balance-sheets to counter the savage pace at which firms and households are cutting back. Were governments not stepping in, the private shift to thrift would be causing an even deeper recession. Tax revenues would fall by more, banks would be even wobblier and public borrowing might end up even higher.
Opini AndaKlik untuk menuliskan opini Anda tentang koleksi ini!

Kembali
design
 
Process time: 0 second(s)