The FASB's cost/benefit constraint in theory and practice  

Oleh:

Martens, Stenley ; Stevens, Kevin

Jenis: Article from Journal - ilmiah internasional
Dalam koleksi: Journal of Business Ethics vol. 13 no. 3 (Mar. 1994), page 171.
Topik: FASB's Cost/Benefit Constraint; Conceptual Framework; Accounting Ethics; Stakeholders

Ketersediaan

Perpustakaan Pusat (Semanggi) Nomor Panggil: BB27.19 Non-tandon: 1 (dapat dipinjam: 0) Tandon: tidak ada

Lihat Detail Induk

Isi artikel

The FASB in its Conceptual Framework has set high principles in the ethics of standard-setting in accounting. This paper concentrates on what the FASB calls the cost/benefit constraint, i.e., the commitment to setting an accounting standard only when the benefits of the standard exceeds the costs of that standard toall stakeholders. This constraint is supposed to take precedence over other concerns, such as neutrality (freedom from bias) of account information. The major conclusion of this paper is that a conflict exists between the FASB's commitment and its practice. There is no evidence that the FASB has always made a costs and benefits judgement with respect to proposed standards. In the cases when such a judgement is made, the FASB discounts social costs; therefore, it is not considering costs to all stakeholders. At the same time the FASB discounts social costs, it seems to have an undue concern for standards that do not increase the volatility of net income. The Conceptual Framework explicitly defines costs as the costs to society as a whole. Stanley Martens is an Assistant Professor of Accounting at DePaul University. He has written many articles for philosophy publications and accounting publications. Kevin Stevens is an Assistant Professor of Accounting at DePaul University. He has written many articles for various accounting publications.

Opini Anda

Klik untuk menuliskan opini Anda tentang koleksi ini!

Kembali