“Ought” implies “can”, or, the moral relevance of a theory of the firm  

Oleh:

Danley, John R.

Jenis: Article from Journal - ilmiah internasional
Dalam koleksi: Journal of Business Ethics vol. 7 no. 1-2 (Feb. 1988), page 23.
Topik: Moral Relevance; Firm; Management; Stockholder

Ketersediaan

Perpustakaan Pusat (Semanggi) Nomor Panggil: BB27.8 Non-tandon: 1 (dapat dipinjam: 0) Tandon: tidak ada

Lihat Detail Induk

Isi artikel

Since ought implies can, i.e., one cannot be obligated to do what one cannot do, the question of corporate responsibility cannot be discussed intelligibly without an inquiry into the range of corporate or managerial discretion. Hence, the moral relevance of a theory of the firm. Within classical or neo-classical economic theory, for instance, firms which act other than to maximize profit are eliminated. They cannot do otherwise, and thus either have no obligations at all or only the duty to maximize profit. The thesis of the Managerial Revolution, if true, establishes only that management is free from direct stockholder control. By asserting that corporations have responsibilities to do other than maximize profit, philosophers assume a wide degree of managerial discretion, without considering recent developments in the theory of the firm which suggest that new incentives and constraints radically restrict managerial liberty in a capitalist society.

Opini Anda

Klik untuk menuliskan opini Anda tentang koleksi ini!

Kembali