Anda belum login :: 18 Apr 2025 06:25 WIB
Detail
ArtikelSingle Day 2 embryo versus blastocyst-stage transfer: a prospective study integrating fresh and frozen embryo transfers  
Oleh: Guerif, F. ; Lemseffer, M. ; Bidault, R. ; Gasnier, O. ; Saussereau, M.H.
Jenis: Article from Journal - ilmiah internasional
Dalam koleksi: Human Reproduction vol. 24 no. 05 (May 2009), page 1051.
Topik: blastocyst/cleavage-stage embryo/cryopreservation/cumulative delivery rate/single embryo transfer
Ketersediaan
  • Perpustakaan FK
    • Nomor Panggil: H07.K.2009.02
    • Non-tandon: 1 (dapat dipinjam: 0)
    • Tandon: tidak ada
    Lihat Detail Induk
Isi artikelBACKGROUND: Whether extended culture allowing selection of embryos with high development potential has any advantage over cleavage-stage embryo transfer remains a matter of debate. Among the currently unsolved questions, the cumulative delivery rate resulting from fresh and frozen embryo transfers needs to be taken into account in both strategies. The aim of our study was, therefore, to compare the efficacy of single embryo transfer either on Day 2 or on Day 5/6 combining fresh and frozen embryo transfers. METHODS: A prospective study including 478 couples assigned on a voluntary basis to undergo elective single embryo transfer (eSET, n = 243) on Day 2 or single blastocyst transfer (SBT, n = 235) on Day 5/6 was performed. The primary outcome measurement was the cumulative delivery rate including fresh and frozen–thawed cycles in both groups. RESULTS: The delivery rate per cycle following fresh embryo transfer was significantly higher in the SBT group compared with the eSET group (P < 0.01). Conversely, frozen embryo and/or blastocyst transfers tended to result in a higher number of deliveries in the eSET compared with the SBT group. Altogether, the cumulative delivery rate per couple, including fresh and frozen embryo transfers, was similar between the two groups (37.9% versus 34.2% in the SBT and eSET groups, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The observed cumulative delivery rates in this study do not allow us to take a position in favor of SBT or eSET. An improvement in blastocyst cryopreservation may change this attitude.
Opini AndaKlik untuk menuliskan opini Anda tentang koleksi ini!

Kembali
design
 
Process time: 0.03125 second(s)