Efektivitas UU Kepailitan dalam Perspektif Kurator Dikaitkan dengan Pemberesan Harta Pailit Perseroan Terbatas  

Oleh:

Simanjuntak, Ricardo

Jenis: Article from Journal - ilmiah nasional - tidak terakreditasi DIKTI
Dalam koleksi: Jurnal Hukum Bisnis vol. 28 no. 1 (2009), page 37-45.
Topik: Curator; Debtor's Property; Creditors; Supervisory Judge;
Fulltext: JJ102 28(1) 2009 37-45.pdf (2.38MB)

Ketersediaan

Perpustakaan Pusat (Semanggi) Nomor Panggil: JJ102.10 Non-tandon: 1 (dapat dipinjam: 0) Tandon: tidak ada

Lihat Detail Induk

Isi artikel

A curator has an arduous task which is setting to right the division of debtor's property or asset to creditors and related party having loan agreement with the insolvent debtor in a fair, fast and transparent manner. There are a legal description on curator task such as Law No. 37/2004, article 15, section (1) explains that "In the decison on the declaration of bankruptcy, a curator and Supervisory Judge from the Court judges must be appointed.", and article 16 section (1) says that "The Curator shall be authorized to perform the management and/or the settlement of the bankruptcy assets since the date on which the bankruptcy decision is rendered despite any submission of cassation or judicial review from the said decision." Professionalism is definitely important requirement for a curator in order to be worked in a fast, efficient, transparent and fair manner. If a curator does not work professionally in dividing debtor's property in case of bankruptcy there will happen a reduction or declining in value of asset or it might be lost. Whatever best of bankruptcy law we have if the curator has improper quality of professionalism, then the bankruptcy law is just a deraming of justice seeker.

Opini Anda

Klik untuk menuliskan opini Anda tentang koleksi ini!

Kembali