Fitting Oval Pegs Into Round Holes Tensions in Evaluating and Publishing Qualitative Research in Top-Tier North American Journals  

Oleh:

Pratt, Michael G.

Jenis: Article from Journal - ilmiah internasional
Dalam koleksi: Organizational Research Methods vol. 11 no. 3 (Jul. 2008), page 481-509.
Topik: Qualitative Methods; Evaluating Qualitative Research; Publishing Qualitative Research; Comparing Qualitative and Quantitative Research
Fulltext: 481.pdf (263.02KB)

Ketersediaan

Perpustakaan Pusat (Semanggi) Nomor Panggil: OO3.10 Non-tandon: 1 (dapat dipinjam: 0) Tandon: tidak ada

Lihat Detail Induk

Isi artikel

A study of qualitative researchers who have submitted and/or published their research in top-tier North American organizational and management journals reveals the evaluative criteria in-use at these journals. Specifically, when asked to take the perspective of an (a) auhor, (b) evaluator (reviewer or editor), and (c) judge of the comparisons between qualitative and quantitative research, three publication tensions were evident. The author offers the metaphor of "fitting a round peg into an oval hole" as a means of capturing these tensions and as a vehicle for organizing the various ways these tensions can be managed.

Opini Anda

Klik untuk menuliskan opini Anda tentang koleksi ini!

Kembali