Privacy and Autonomy: From Warren and Brandies To Roe and Cruzan  

Oleh:

Halper, Thomas

Jenis: Article from Journal - ilmiah internasional
Dalam koleksi: The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy vol. 21 no. 2 (Apr. 1996), page 121-135.
Topik: Abortion; Autonomy; Charles Warren; Cruzan v. Director; Missiuri Department of Health; Griswold v. Connecticut; In re Quinlan; Louis Brandeis; Privacy; Right To Die; Roe v. Wade; Supreme Court.

Ketersediaan

Perpustakaan Pusat (Semanggi) Nomor Panggil: MM80.5 Non-tandon: 1 (dapat dipinjam: 0) Tandon: tidak ada

Lihat Detail Induk

Isi artikel

warren and Brandeis' tort againts invansion of privacy had chiefly a social goal: to enlist the courts to reinforce the norm of civity. Years later in Griswold v. Connecticut (1965), the Supreme Court announced a constitutional right of privacy that was personal in focus. Here and insubsequent rulings on abortion and the "right to be let alone" had metamorphosed into a right to autonomy, whose amoeboid contours made prediction or even description a tricky busniess. But privacy is an unsatisfactory proxy for autonomy, and perhaps for this reason has dwindled in importance as rationale in these areas.

Opini Anda

Klik untuk menuliskan opini Anda tentang koleksi ini!

Kembali