Anda belum login :: 16 Apr 2025 22:23 WIB
Home
|
Logon
Hidden
»
Administration
»
Collection Detail
Detail
A Radical Rupture in the Paradigm of Modern Medicine: Conflicts of Interest, Fiduciary Obligations, and the Scientific Ideal
Oleh:
Khushf, George
Jenis:
Article from Journal - ilmiah internasional
Dalam koleksi:
The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy vol. 23 no. 1 (Feb. 1998)
,
page 98-122.
Topik:
Conflicts of Interest
;
Fiduciary Obligation
;
Medical Economies
;
Organizational Ethics
Fulltext:
MM80V23N1P98.pdf
(63.56KB)
Ketersediaan
Perpustakaan Pusat (Semanggi)
Nomor Panggil:
MM80.8
Non-tandon:
1 (dapat dipinjam: 0)
Tandon:
tidak ada
Lihat Detail Induk
Isi artikel
Conflicts of interest serve as a cipher for a radical rupture in the Flexnerian paradigm of medicine, and they can only be addressed if we recognize that health care is now practiced by institutions, not just individual physicians. By showing how “appropriate utilization of services” or “that which is medically indicated” is a function of socioeconomic factors related to institutional responsibilities, I point toward an administrative and organizational ethic as a needed component for addressing conflicts of interest. The argument is developed by reviewing three important books. First, I consider Mark Rodwin's attempt to configure the economic structures of medicine so that classical fiduciary and scientific ideals can be fostered. Second, I consider E. Haavi Morreim's attempt to modify the classical ideals in order to account for new economic realities. Finally, by considering essays in a recent volume on conflicts of interest edited by Spece, Shimm, and Buchanan, I argue for a constructive dialectic between the approaches of Rodwin and Morreim. In order to properly address conflicts of interest, there must be a radical reassessment of medicine that accounts for the interrelation between scientific, ethical, and economic concerns. Until institutions come into view and professional ethics is developed to account for their role, legitimate interests and obligations of diverse parties cannot be harmonized.
Opini Anda
Klik untuk menuliskan opini Anda tentang koleksi ini!
Kembali
Process time: 0.015625 second(s)