A Question for Egalitarians  

Oleh:

Kekes, John

Jenis: Article from Journal - ilmiah internasional
Dalam koleksi: Ethics: An International Journal of Social Political and Legal Philosophy vol. 107 no. 4 (Jul. 1997), page 658-669.
Topik: A Question for Egalitarians

Ketersediaan

Perpustakaan Pusat (Semanggi) Nomor Panggil: EE44.6 Non-tandon: 1 (dapat dipinjam: 0) Tandon: tidak ada

Lihat Detail Induk

Isi artikel

It is basic egalitarian belief that serious unjustified inequalities are morally objectionable and that the measure of a just society is the extent to which it eliminates or at least reduces them. Inequalities are serious if they affect primary goods, which are goods necessary for living a good life, such as adequate income, health care, education, physical security, housing, and so forth. there are several egalitarian views about what serious inequalities are unjustified, but only one of them will be considered here. According to it, all serious inequalities are unjustified unless they benefit everyone in one's society, especially those who are worst off. The best-known defenders of this view are probably John Rawls and Thomas Nagel. In order to avoid pedantry and verbosity, this view will be reffered to simply as "egalitarian," although egalitarianism has other versions as well.

Opini Anda

Klik untuk menuliskan opini Anda tentang koleksi ini!

Kembali