Kantian Constuctivism and Reconstuctivism: Rawls and Habermas in Dialogue  

Oleh:

McCarthy, Thomas

Jenis: Article from Journal - ilmiah internasional
Dalam koleksi: Ethics: An International Journal of Social Political and Legal Philosophy vol. 105 no. 1 (Oct. 1994), page 44-63.
Topik: Kantian Constuctivism and Reconstuctivism: Rawls and Habermas in Dialogue

Ketersediaan

Perpustakaan Pusat (Semanggi) Nomor Panggil: EE44.1 Non-tandon: 1 (dapat dipinjam: 0) Tandon: tidak ada

Lihat Detail Induk

Isi artikel

One regrettable consequence of the split between "analytic" and "continental" philosophy in this country has been a postponement of the encounter between two of the most highly developed and differentiated political theories of our time. For more than two decades now, John Rawls and Jurgen Habermas have been traveling different paths from their common starting point in Kant's practical philosophy. Despite the differences, they have remained close enough to make their disagreements instuctive. This has not gone entirely unnoticed, either in Germany, where a discussion of the relative strengths and weaknesses of the two approaches is now underway, or here. There are interesting English-language discussions by theorists who work both sides of the street, including an excellent book on the subject by Kenneth Baynes. But the appearance in the fall of 1992 of Habermas's Faktizitat und Geltung-which compares with A Theory of Justice in architectonic complexity-and in the spring of 1993 of Rawls's Political Liberalism makes clear that the discussion has only just begun.

Opini Anda

Klik untuk menuliskan opini Anda tentang koleksi ini!

Kembali