When Justice Matters  

Oleh:

Schmidtz, David

Jenis: Article from Journal - ilmiah internasional
Dalam koleksi: Ethics: An International Journal of Social Political and Legal Philosophy vol. 117 no. 3 (Apr. 2007), page 433-459.
Topik: Justice; Bad; Positive; Society; Theories Map

Ketersediaan

Perpustakaan Pusat (Semanggi) Nomor Panggil: EE44.23 Non-tandon: 1 (dapat dipinjam: 0) Tandon: tidak ada

Lihat Detail Induk

Isi artikel

Reasonable people disagree about what is just. Why? This itself is an item over which reasonable people disagree. Our analyses of justice (like our analyses of knowledge, free will, meaning, etc.) all have counter exmple. Why? In part, the problem lies in the nature of theorizing itself. A truism in philosophy of science: for any set data, an infinite number of theories will fit the facts. So, even if we agree on particular cases, we still, in likehood, disagree on how to pull those judgements together to form theory. Theorizing per se does not produce consensus. Why not? An argument is sound or not? An argument is sound or not. So why isn't a theory compelling to all of us, if sound, or none of us, if not?

Opini Anda

Klik untuk menuliskan opini Anda tentang koleksi ini!

Kembali