Egalitarianism, Option Luck, and Responsibility  

Oleh:

Lippert-Rasmussen, Kasper

Jenis: Article from Journal - ilmiah internasional
Dalam koleksi: Ethics: An International Journal of Social Political and Legal Philosophy vol. 111 no. 3 (Apr. 2001), page 548-579.
Topik: Option Luck; Brute Luck; Unacceptable Risks

Ketersediaan

Perpustakaan Pusat (Semanggi) Nomor Panggil: EE44.12 Non-tandon: 1 (dapat dipinjam: 0) Tandon: tidak ada

Lihat Detail Induk

Isi artikel

As construed by the majority of its current supporters, egalitarianism ac¬commodates choice and responsibility. This is evident from representative statements of the basic egalitarian principle such as: “It is had- unjust and unfair-for some be worse off than others [through no fault or choice of their own].”’1 Also, “[Egalitarianism’s] purpose is to eliminate involuntary disadvantage, by which I (stipulatively) mean disadvan tage for which the sufferer cannot be held responsible, since it does not appropriately reflect choices that he has made or would make.”2 It fol¬lows that, for most contemporary egalitarians, inequalities of outcome need not be bad.

Opini Anda

Klik untuk menuliskan opini Anda tentang koleksi ini!

Kembali