Anda belum login :: 23 Jul 2025 23:01 WIB
Detail
ArtikelPsychometric Accuracy and (the Continuing Need for) Quality Thinking in Meta-Analysis  
Oleh: Bobko, Philip ; Roth, Philip L.
Jenis: Article from Journal - ilmiah internasional
Dalam koleksi: Organizational Research Methods vol. 11 no. 1 (Jan. 2008), page 114-126.
Topik: Meta-Analysis; Prediction; Selection; Concurrent Designs
Fulltext: 114.pdf (128.4KB)
Ketersediaan
  • Perpustakaan Pusat (Semanggi)
    • Nomor Panggil: OO3.9
    • Non-tandon: 1 (dapat dipinjam: 0)
    • Tandon: tidak ada
    Lihat Detail Induk
Isi artikelThe four feature-topic articles advance the accuracy of meta-analytic techniques. As might be expected, most articles focus on more precise ways to aggregate all available relationships in a given topic domain. Such aggregation results in overall estimates of relationships and estimates conditional on particular moderators. However, scholars and practitioners can expect more than empirical aggregation from meta-analysis. Careful attention to underlying theory, application, and important methodological issues will result in clearer understanding and explanation. Using the situational judgment testing literature as an example, the current analysis suggests the need for much more upfront, reflective thinking about each meta-analytic study's purpose and how this thinking relates to the inclusion or choice of primary studies, analytic method, coding, and so on. For example, when the focus is on prediction, frequent use of concurrent designs may bias aggregated parameter estimates. Also, it is noted that methods and constructs continue to be confounded in the research literatures.
Opini AndaKlik untuk menuliskan opini Anda tentang koleksi ini!

Kembali
design
 
Process time: 0.015625 second(s)