Between Scylla and Charybdis: Reinhard Bendix on Theory, Concepts and Comparison in Max Weber’s Historical Sociology  

Oleh:

Caldwell, Raymond

Jenis: Article from Journal - ilmiah internasional
Dalam koleksi: History of the Human Sciences vol. 15 no. 3 (Aug. 2002), page 25–51.
Topik: comparative method; historical explanation; ideal types; modernity; Talcott Parsons; universal concepts
Fulltext: 25.pdf (132.93KB)

Isi artikel

Reinhard Bendix made a major contribution to the early reception and interpretation of Max Weber’s work. His classic study, Max Weber: An Intellectual Portrait (1960), developed a remarkably consistent interpretation of Weber as a comparative historical sociologist. Bendix also emulated and subtly reinterpreted in his own work key aspects of Weber’s comparative method and research strategies. By searching for a middle course between ‘Scylla and Charybdis’, between the abstractions of theoretical concepts and the richness of empirical evidence, Bendix sought to reinterpret and renew the vital centre of Weber’s comparative enterprise as a study of western uniqueness. In so doing, he decisively challenged Talcott Parsons’s alternative methodological reading of Weber’s work. Yet, curiously Bendix’s status as a Weber interpreter and comparative historian profoundly influenced by Weber’s legacy has often been neglected or misinterpreted. This article re-examines Bendix’s classic reading of Weber’s corpus, and the way in which he sought to keep alive in his substantive work the promise and spirit of Weber’s comparative historical sociology.

Opini Anda

Klik untuk menuliskan opini Anda tentang koleksi ini!

Kembali