Fitting The Forum To The Family Fuss Choosing Mediation, Collaborative Law, Or Cooperative Law For Negotiating Divorce Cases  

Oleh:

Lande, John ; Herman, Gregg

Jenis: Article from Journal - ilmiah internasional
Dalam koleksi: Family Court Review vol. 42 no. 2 (Apr. 2004), page 280-291.
Fulltext: 280.pdf (93.08KB)

Isi artikel

This article analyzes advantages and disadvantages of mediation, collaborative law, and cooperative law based on the parties’ capabilities, attitudes about professional services, and assessments of and preferences about the risks of various procedures. Each of these procedures has virtues and there is great value in providing clients and practitioners with a choice of procedures. Under collaborative and cooperative law, lawyers and clients agree to focus exclusively on negotiation from the outset the case, typically using a problem-solving process. Collaborative lawinvolves a written “disqualification agreement” between all the parties and their lawyers under which lawyers are disqualified from representing parties in litigation if either party chooses to litigate. Cooperative law is similar but does not use the disqualification agreement. Because most communities do not have lawyers offering cooperative law, collaborative law groups should encourage at least some of their members to offer clients the option of cooperative law.

Opini Anda

Klik untuk menuliskan opini Anda tentang koleksi ini!

Kembali