A Comparison of The Practical Utility of Traditional, Statistical, and Hybrid Job Evaluation Approaches  

Oleh:

Gomez-Mejia, Luis R. ; Page, Ronald C. ; Tornow, Walter W.

Jenis: Article from Journal - ilmiah internasional
Dalam koleksi: The Academy of Management Journal vol. 25 no. 4 (Dec. 1982), page 790-809.
Topik: JOB EVALUATION; pratical utility; traditional; statistical; hybrid job evaluation approach
Fulltext: AA36_25-04_Luis R Gomez-Mejia.pdf (538.81KB)

Ketersediaan

Perpustakaan Pusat (Semanggi) Nomor Panggil: AA36.1 Non-tandon: 1 (dapat dipinjam: 0) Tandon: tidak ada

Lihat Detail Induk

Isi artikel

This study compares the relative accuracy and practical utility of seven different job evaluation approaches. Results of 657 position evaluations indicate that traditional and hybrid systems are at least as accurate, reliable, and objective in predicting grade level as are statistical policy - capturing methods when based on a standardized job analysis tool.

Opini Anda

Klik untuk menuliskan opini Anda tentang koleksi ini!

Kembali