‘Passions and Constraint’: The Marginalization of Passion in Liberal Political Theory  

Oleh:

Hall, Cheryl

Jenis: Article from Journal - ilmiah internasional
Dalam koleksi: Philosophy & Social Criticism vol. 28 no. 6 (Nov. 2002), page 727–748.
Topik: passion ; reason ; politics ; liberalism ; eros
Fulltext: 727PSC286.pdf (89.58KB)

Isi artikel

Positive arguments on behalf of passion are scarce in liberal political theory. Rather, liberal theorists tend to push passion to the margins of their theories of politics, either by ignoring it or by explicitly arguing that passion poses a danger to politics and is best kept out of the public realm. The purpose of this essay is to criticize these marginalizations and to illustrate their roots in impoverished conceptions of passion. Using a richer conception of passion as the desire for an envisioned good, I argue that it is neither possible nor desirable to eliminate passion from politics. Passion should therefore be established as a central category of analysis in political theory alongside other key concerns.

Opini Anda

Klik untuk menuliskan opini Anda tentang koleksi ini!

Kembali