Sexual Harassment and the “Repetition Requirement”  

Oleh:

Landau, Iddo

Jenis: Article from Journal - ilmiah internasional
Dalam koleksi: Philosophy of the Social Sciences vol. 34 no. 1 (Mar. 2004), page 79-83.
Topik: sexual harassment; discrimination; law; ethics; feminism
Fulltext: 79PSS341.pdf (48.93KB)

Isi artikel

In his “Reply to Iddo Landau,” EdmundWall responds to the author’s critique of some of the views expressed in his “Sexual Harassment andWrongful Communication.” The present article concentrates on what the author takes to be the main problem inWall’s definition: by requiring that any act, even if intentional and cruel in nature, needs to be repeated to count as sexual harassment, Wall allows too much leeway and renders permissible a wide range of intentional, mean, and harmful actions that most, including, the author believes,Wall himself, would like to outlaw. The article considers Wall’s linguistic and nonlinguistic responses to this critique and finds them problematic.

Opini Anda

Klik untuk menuliskan opini Anda tentang koleksi ini!

Kembali