This article focuses on the events surrounding a homosexual Romanian man?s attempt to be recognized as a refugee in Britain. Numerous themes emerge such as the nature of authenticity, knowledge, identity, pleasure, evidence and the homosexual refugee as being caught in between two legal apparatuses (that is, fleeing from the hostility of one legal regime and then trying to gain refugee status, and thus legal protection, via a British Immigration Tribunal). In this article, the corporeality and sensuality of legal practices are exposed in the form of ?practices of truth?. That is, in this case medico-legal ?living (London, Thousand Oaks and New Delhi), individuals? were to perceive, hear, speak, touch and penetrate the ?secrets? of Mr Vraciu?s body in order to authenticate his sexual identity for the purposes of law. This case also demonstrates the existence of a differend between what I describe as the self-knowledge of homosexuality and the ?legal? fact-based, or authorized knowledge of homosexual identity produced through practices of truth. |