Informational Constraint and Focal Point Convergence: Theoretical Implications of Plurality-Rule Elections for the New Institutionalism  

Oleh:

Abizadeh, Arash

Jenis: Article from Journal - ilmiah internasional
Dalam koleksi: Rationality and Society vol. 13 no. 1 (Feb. 2001), page 99–136.
Topik: Baha’i; focal points; informational constraint; new institutionalism • preference formation
Fulltext: 99RS131.pdf (132.75KB)

Isi artikel

Plurality-rule national Baha’i elections are an anomaly among democratic elections, providing the opportunity for novel insights into institutional theory: while the pool of candidates consists of several thousand individuals, there are tight institutional constraints on information and communication regarding voters’ preferences – nominations and campaigning are banned. Contrary to the expectations of received rational choice institutional theory, however, no institutional mechanisms facilitating organizational forms such as parties have arisen to yield Pareto-superior outcomes via explicit vote coordination. To address this anomaly, an analytical constrained-information model of Canadian Baha’i elections with endogenous preference formation is used to develop the notion of focal point convergence, and to defend sociological institutionalism’s view of instrumental rationality as socially constructed and only one among several possible cultural meanings that may constitute institutions.

Opini Anda

Klik untuk menuliskan opini Anda tentang koleksi ini!

Kembali