Race in The Courtroom : Perceptions of Guilt and Dispositional Attributions  

Oleh:

Sommers, Samuel R. ; Ellsworth, Phoebe C.

Jenis: Article from Journal - ilmiah internasional
Dalam koleksi: Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (http://journals.sagepub.com/home/pspc) vol. 26 no. 11 (2000), page 1367-1379.
Topik: COURT; dispositional attributions; guilt; court room
Fulltext: 1367PSPB2611.pdf (132.46KB)

Ketersediaan

Perpustakaan Pusat (Semanggi) Nomor Panggil: PP45.9 Non-tandon: 1 (dapat dipinjam: 0) Tandon: tidak ada

Lihat Detail Induk

Isi artikel

The present studies compare the judgments of White and Black mock jurors in interracial trials. In Study 1, the defendant’s race did not influence White college students’ decisions but Black students demonstrated ingroup / outgroup bias in their guilt ratings and attributions for the defendant’s behaviour. The aversive nature of modern racism suggests that Whites are motivated to appear non prejudiced when racial issues are salient; therefore, the race salience of a trial summary was manipulated and given to noncollege students in Study 2. Once again, the defendant’s race did not influence Whites when racial issues were salient. But in the non - race - salient version of the same interracial case, White mock jurors rated the Black defendant more guilty, aggressive, and violent than the White defendant. Black mock jurors demonstrated same - race leniency in both versions of the trial, suggesting that racial issues are generally salient in the minds of Black jurors in interracial cases with Black defendants.

Opini Anda

Klik untuk menuliskan opini Anda tentang koleksi ini!

Kembali