Reconsidering Democracy  

Oleh:

Huijer, Marli

Jenis: Article from Journal - ilmiah internasional
Dalam koleksi: Science Communication vol. 24 no. 4 (Jun. 2003), page 479-502.
Topik: citizenship; democracy; big science; Human Genome Project; contextualization
Fulltext: 479SC244.pdf (106.12KB)

Isi artikel

What options are open for people—citizens, politicians, and other nonscientists—to become actively involved in and anticipate new directions in the life sciences? In addressing this question, this article focuses on the start of the Human Genome Project (1985-1990). By contrasting various models of democracy (liberal, republican, deliberative), I examine the democratic potential the models provide for citizens’ involvement in setting priorities and funding patterns related to big science projects. To enhance the democratizing of big science projects and give citizens opportunities to reflect, anticipate, and negotiate on newdirections in science and technology at a global level, liberal democracy with its national scope and representative structure does not suffice. Although republican (communicative) and deliberative (associative) democracy models meet the need for greater citizen involvement, the ways to achieve the ideal at a global level still remain to be developed.

Opini Anda

Klik untuk menuliskan opini Anda tentang koleksi ini!

Kembali