Implicit Attributions and Biases : An Answer to Edwards and Potter's Rejoinder  

Oleh:

Fiedler, Klaus ; Schmid, Jeannette

Jenis: Article from Journal - ilmiah internasional
Dalam koleksi: Theory and Psychology vol. 9 no. 6 (Des. 1999), page 837–845.
Topik: attributions; attribution; category model; conversation; discourse analysis; lexical approach; linguistic category model; implicit attributions; biases; rejoinder
Fulltext: 837TP96.pdf (59.33KB)

Isi artikel

In this final comment, we point out several misunderstandings in Edwards and Potter's (1999) rejoinder and defend the arguments advanced in our original critique. In addition, we make an attempt to clarify that a lexical approach to language and attribution, based on the Linguistic Category Model (LCM), cannot be reduced to a lexical coding scheme. Rather, the LCM places numerous theoretical constraints on attribution, most of which have been tested and substantiated in many studies ignored in Edwards and Potter's articles. We point out in particular how the LCM can deal with the the sequential, contextualized, interaction oriented nature of conversation.

Opini Anda

Klik untuk menuliskan opini Anda tentang koleksi ini!

Kembali