Enlightenment as Tragedy: Reflections on Adorno's Ethics  

Oleh:

Gandesha, Samir

Jenis: Article from Journal - ilmiah internasional
Dalam koleksi: Thesis Eleven vol. 65 no. 1 (Mei 2001), page 109–130.
Topik: Adorno; aesthetics; art; Enlightenment; Horkheimer; Oedipus; vision
Fulltext: 109TE651.pdf (88.81KB)

Isi artikel

This article argues that the figure of Oedipus lies at the heart of Horkheimer and Adorno's Dialectic of Enlightenment. Oedipus is the prototypical Aufklärer as no one can rival him in his courageous attempt to employ his own autonomous reason 'without direction from another'; yet selfknowledge remains beyond his grasp. Indeed, Oedipus' obsessive drive to bring the truth to light ultimately leads him to put out his own eyes because he is unable to bear the sight of the catastrophe that this drive engenders. Oedipus' demise represents in allegorical form the self-destruction of enlightenment itself. Enlightenment is similarly driven to illuminate the world in its totality by reducing it to philosophical concepts. In the process, however, it becomes blind to the question of its dependence upon that which it purports to possess. In its attempt at total illumination, therefore, enlightenment does not effectuate an exit or Ausgang from the opacity of myth, as Kant had held, but rather is blinded, paradoxically, by the radiance of its own projections. Reading the dialectic of enlightenment through the tragedy of Oedipus leads back to the enigmatic question of art as the means by which the rationalization and disenchantment of the world can be reflected upon critically.

Opini Anda

Klik untuk menuliskan opini Anda tentang koleksi ini!

Kembali