Argumentation studies and discourse analysis: the French situation and global perspectives  

Oleh:

Plantin, Christian

Jenis: Article from Journal - ilmiah internasional
Dalam koleksi: Discourse Studies (Full Text) vol. 4 no. 3 (Aug. 2002), page 343-368.
Topik: dialogue; French studies; informal logic; pragmatics; rhetoric
Fulltext: 343DES43.pdf (121.65KB)

Isi artikel

This article focuses on the development of argumentation studies in France and their complex relations with discourse analysis. First, the meanings of the basic word ‘argument’ in French and in American English are discussed and contrasted. Second, a brief historical section summarizes the complex history of rhetorical argumentation in France up until the late 1980s and the Perelmanian revival. Third, Grize ‘natural logic’ and Anscombre and Ducrot ‘argumentation within language’ are briefly discussed from the discourse analysis point of view. These programmes have restored argumentation study to favour in France, where it is currently the research paradigm most referred to in recent work. The fourth section examines the present situation in France which is characterized by a strong new interest in argumentation in all disciplines; this is fuelling a tendency towards the use of argumentation theories – classical or modern – for practical, short-term analysis purposes. Fifth, a proposal is made for a better integration of argumentation studies in discourse analysis, based on the conception of argumentation as opposite points of view, either in face-to-face disputes or in written arguments, sometimes lasting for several centuries. This article is based on the premise that research into the history of rhetoric and argumentation, as well as in specific discourse analytic trends that emerged in France during the 1970s, has some permanent value in that a better understanding of an academic discipline’s historical development can be a good introduction to its current problems.

Opini Anda

Klik untuk menuliskan opini Anda tentang koleksi ini!

Kembali